Google is spending billions on AI. So why are profits still climbing?

Have you started buying Halloween candy yet? Depending on where you live and what kind of candy you buy, the tax man may be reaching into the bowl too. It turns out candy taxes are surprisingly complicated. With cocoa prices climbing sharply in recent years, the cost of filling that Halloween bowl is already higher. Add sales tax and that bag of chocolate can cost a little more depending on which state you call home.  But here is where things get strange. For tax purposes, not every candy bar is actually considered candy. Twenty three states follow a common set of sales tax rules that define candy as something made with sugar or other sweeteners combined with things like chocolate, fruit or nuts. There is one interesting exception. Flour. If a chocolate bar contains flour, it may not technically qualify as candy under those rules. That means something like a Kit Kat, Whoppers or other chocolate containing flour could receive different tax treatment than a traditional chocolate bar. Yes, your candy bar ingredients can actually determine your tax bill. Then there are states where the rules are much simpler. Arizona, California, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and South Carolina generally do not charge state sales tax on chocolate purchased for consumption away from where it is sold. Where you buy it can matter too. Chocolate purchased at a grocery store and taken home may be treated differently from candy purchased at a movie theater, sports arena, vending machine or festival. And local taxes can still apply even when the state does not tax the candy. Here in Alabama, there is another wrinkle. Alabama still taxes groceries, although the state grocery tax has been reduced to 2 percent. Local sales taxes can also be added, so the final amount you pay can vary depending on where you shop. For one bag of Halloween candy, we are probably talking about a small amount of money. But there is a bigger lesson hiding in the candy bowl. Taxes are not always as simple as the percentage printed on a chart. Where you live, what you buy and sometimes even the ingredients in what you buy can change what you pay. So this Halloween, if you find yourself choosing between two candy bars, you can add one more thing to consider. Apparently flour can be a financial decision too.

Have a credit card balance, plan to buy a car or keep money in savings? The Federal Reserve’s latest decision could affect you. The Fed raised its key interest rate by one quarter of a percentage point on September 16. It was the first increase since 2023 and brought the rate to about 3.9 percent. The goal is to slow spending and borrowing as inflation continues to run higher than the Fed would like. That may sound like something that only matters on Wall Street. But changes in this rate eventually reach many of the financial decisions people make every day. Credit cards could cost more Most credit cards have variable interest rates. When the Fed raises rates, card companies often follow. The increase may not look dramatic on your next statement. Someone carrying a balance of about $6,600 at a 22 percent interest rate could see the minimum payment rise by around $1.38 a month. But the bigger problem is that credit card rates were already high. If you carry a balance from month to month, even a small increase means more of every payment goes toward interest instead of paying down what you owe. This may be a good time to focus on your highest interest card, look for a lower rate option or avoid adding new charges that cannot be paid off quickly. Car loans may also move higher Auto loan rates could increase, although the change may take time to show up. A quarter point increase would probably add only a few dollars to the monthly payment on a typical vehicle loan. The larger issue is that new and used vehicle prices are already stretching many household budgets. If you are shopping for a vehicle, look at the total cost and not just the monthly payment. A longer loan can make the payment look better while leaving you paying much more interest over time. Mortgage rates are more complicated The Fed does not directly set mortgage rates. Mortgage rates are influenced more heavily by the bond market, inflation expectations and the outlook for the economy. That means they may rise, fall or remain steady even after the Fed changes its rate. Still, continued concern about inflation can keep mortgage rates elevated. Anyone buying a home should compare several lenders because even a small difference in the rate can add up over a 15 or 30 year loan. People with a fixed mortgage will not see their current rate change. Those with an adjustable rate mortgage or a variable home equity line could eventually pay more. Savers may finally see some benefit There is a good side to higher rates. Banks may increase what they pay on high yield savings accounts, money market accounts and new certificates of deposit. Some high yield savings accounts were already paying above 4 percent before the Fed acted. Do not assume your bank will automatically give you a better return. The national average savings account was paying only 0.63 percent shortly before the Fed’s announcement. Take a few minutes to check the rate on your account. Moving emergency savings to an insured high yield account could help your money earn more while remaining available when you need it. What should you do now? There is no need to make a sudden financial move because of one rate increase. Start by checking the interest rates you are currently paying and earning. Pay particular attention to credit cards and other variable rate debt. If you have money sitting in a low paying savings account, compare it with other insured options. The Fed’s decision may only change individual payments by a few dollars at first. But when borrowing is already expensive and household budgets are tight, those small changes can build over time.

Have you ever wondered how someone decides what a business is worth? It is not always as simple as looking at the profit shown on the financial statements. A buyer wants to know how much money the business is likely to produce after the current owner leaves. That is where EBITDA add backs enter the conversation. EBITDA is one way buyers measure the operating performance of a business. It looks at earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. An add back removes an expense that is not expected to continue under new ownership. These adjustments can have a much larger effect than many business owners realize. Imagine that a company identifies a legitimate $100,000 expense that will disappear after the sale. If a buyer values the business at eight times its adjusted earnings, that one adjustment could potentially add $800,000 to the value. But the buyer is not simply going to accept every expense the owner wants removed. What Usually Counts The strongest add backs are specific, unusual and supported by records. A legal settlement that happened once may qualify. The same could be true for the cost of installing a new software system or repairing damage from a rare event. An expense that has nothing to do with the regular operation of the company may also be removed. One example would be a gain or loss from selling a piece of equipment or property. Owner compensation can sometimes be adjusted too. An owner may receive more than the company would need to pay someone else to perform the same job. That difference could count, but the owner needs real information showing what a replacement would cost. The basic test is simple. Will this expense still be there after the buyer takes control? If the answer is clearly no and the records support it, the adjustment has a better chance of surviving the buyer’s review. What Buyers May Reject Problems begin when an owner presents an estimate without evidence. A buyer will want to see invoices, payroll information, contracts or entries in the company’s accounting records. A round number based on memory or a general feeling will not carry much weight. Personal expenses paid by the business can also create trouble. They may be legitimate add backs, but the owner must be able to show that the expenses were truly personal and not necessary for operating the company. Another warning sign is an expense described as unusual that appears year after year. If the company regularly faces the same cost, the buyer may consider it part of doing business. Owners can also lose credibility by claiming an adjustment that is larger than the expense recorded in the books. Once a buyer finds one questionable number, the buyer may begin looking more closely at everything else. That uncertainty can reduce the price or slow down the entire sale. Preparation Should Begin Early The best time to prepare for a sale is before the business is on the market. Owners should document unusual expenses when they happen. A short explanation and supporting records can be much easier to produce today than several years later. Personal spending should be separated from business spending whenever possible. Agreements between the company and another business owned by the same person should also reflect normal market prices. Monthly financial statements need to be accurate and consistent. Revenue, bonuses, commissions and major purchases should be handled under clear accounting policies. This gives buyers confidence that the numbers reflect the real condition of the business. Owners should also think honestly about their own role. Can the company operate without them? Will someone need to be hired? How much will that person cost? Will the owner remain involved for a period after the sale? Those answers affect how much of the owner’s compensation can actually be removed from the company’s expenses. The Real Story Is About Trust Add backs are not just accounting adjustments. They help tell the buyer what the business may look like under new ownership. Good records make that story believable. Weak estimates create doubt. An owner who waits until a sale begins may spend valuable time trying to explain years of complicated transactions. An owner who prepares early can present a cleaner and more predictable picture.  That preparation could help protect the value built through years of work. When the time comes to sell, the numbers should make it easy for a buyer to see what the business can really produce.

Is it always smarter to pay cash for a car if you can afford it? Not necessarily. Avoiding a monthly payment can feel like the safest choice in retirement. You buy the car, eliminate the debt and have one less bill to worry about each month. But the bigger question is where that cash will come from. If you have enough money in savings to pay for the car and still maintain a healthy emergency fund, paying cash may make sense. You avoid interest charges and do not have to work a car payment into your retirement budget. The decision becomes more complicated if you need to pull a large amount from a retirement account. Money withdrawn from a traditional IRA or 401(k) is generally treated as taxable income. Taking out enough to buy a car could increase your tax bill. It may also push your income high enough to affect what you pay for Medicare in a future year. That means a $50,000 car could require a withdrawal of more than $50,000 once taxes are considered. Financing may allow you to spread those withdrawals over several years. It can also help you keep more cash available for medical expenses, home repairs and other unexpected costs. The interest rate matters too. If the loan has a high rate, paying cash becomes more attractive. If affordable financing is available and your money can remain invested or earning interest, financing may be worth considering. But future investment returns are never guaranteed. A possible return in the market should not automatically be treated as better than the guaranteed cost of a loan. The monthly payment also needs to fit comfortably within your retirement income. A car payment that forces you to withdraw more from savings every month could create another financial problem. The better choice is not simply cash or financing. It is the option that protects your taxes, monthly income and available savings. Before buying, look at the full cost of each option. Include the interest, possible taxes on withdrawals and how much cash you would have left afterward. A financial or tax professional can also help you understand how a large withdrawal could affect your specific situation.  Having enough money to pay cash does not always mean paying cash is the smartest move. In retirement, keeping your overall financial plan healthy matters more than avoiding one monthly bill. Source: Forbes

When you think about successful stocks, you probably think about big technology companies or businesses that seem to be in the news every day. But one of the most consistent companies in the stock market does something much less exciting. It provides water. American States Water recently increased its dividend by 8.2 percent. That marks the 72nd year in a row the company has given shareholders a larger annual dividend. The company has paid dividends every year since 1931. A dividend is money a company pays to people who own its stock. If you own shares, you may receive a payment every three months. It can provide income without requiring you to sell your investment. American States Water now pays about $2.18 per share annually. Its dividend has grown at an average annual rate of about 8.7 percent over the past decade. The stock currently has a dividend yield of around 2.5 percent. So how has a water company kept this going for so long? Water is something people need regardless of what is happening with the economy. American States Water operates regulated water and electric utilities. It also provides water services to military installations through long term government contracts. That does not mean the stock is guaranteed to go up or that its dividend will always increase. Utility companies spend heavily on pipes, treatment systems and other infrastructure. They can also be affected by debt, interest rates and decisions from government regulators. The larger lesson is not that everyone should rush out and buy this particular stock. It is that investing does not always have to be exciting. A business that provides an essential service, earns steady income and regularly shares some of that money with investors can quietly build wealth over time. Sometimes the companies getting the least attention are the ones doing the same important job year after year.

Thinking about buying a house? You are probably watching mortgage rates almost as closely as the price of the house itself. And right now, those rates are keeping a lot of people from making a move. Existing home sales fell 1.7 percent in July compared with June, according to new housing data released this week. That puts sales at an annual pace of about 4.06 million homes. That is the second straight monthly decline. The biggest problem is pretty simple. Buying a house is still expensive. Mortgage rates moved higher during July and recently reached around 6.7 percent for a 30 year mortgage. When rates rise, even a little, the monthly payment on a house can change enough to push some families out of the market. But here is the interesting part. Fewer sales have not necessarily meant cheaper houses. The median price of an existing home in July was about $434,100. That is 2 percent higher than a year ago and not far from the record set in June. There are also fewer homes available. About 1.54 million homes were on the market at the end of July, slightly fewer than both the previous month and a year ago. That creates an unusual situation. Buyers are struggling with high prices and high interest rates. At the same time, many homeowners who already have mortgages at much lower rates have little reason to sell their house and take on a new mortgage near 7 percent. So both sides are waiting. First time buyers may be feeling this the most. They represented only 29 percent of July home sales. Historically, that number has been closer to 40 percent. For anyone thinking about buying a home, the number to keep watching may not be home prices. It may be mortgage rates. A meaningful drop in rates could make monthly payments more manageable and bring more buyers back into the market. It could also convince more current homeowners that it is finally time to sell. Until then, the housing market may continue to feel like what it has become for many families. A waiting game.

E ven though the higher standard deduction limits make charitable deductions harder to find, there are still great options to find tax breaks within your charitable giving. Here are five tips to use charitable tax breaks: Qualified charitable distributions. If you’re age 70½ or older, you can transfer up to $100,000 (or a total of $200,000 for joint filers) directly from your IRA to a qualified charitable organization without paying any tax. Because distributions done this way are not subject to federal tax, it's like contributing with pre-tax dollars. Plus, your contribution counts as a required minimum distribution for tax purposes. Appreciated securities. Donate appreciated property (like securities) to a qualified charity and you can deduct the current fair market value (FMV) of the property if you’ve owned them longer than a year. For example, if you acquired stock three years ago for $7,500 and it’s now worth $10,000, you can donate it and deduct the entire $10,000 FMV if you itemize your deductions. There’s no capital gains tax on the $2,500 appreciation in value – ever! This is a great strategy if you are close to or over the itemized deduction threshold in a given year. Bunching donations. Under current tax law, the standard deduction is more than double the historic rates, effectively lowering the amount of taxpayers who will itemize their deductions. As a result, it now makes sense to “bunch” large gifts of property, like securities (see #2), in a tax year in which you expect to itemize. Conversely, if you don’t anticipate itemizing in the current tax year, you may consider postponing donations into the next year. The idea is to get the most tax deductions possible over a multiyear period. Leverage the new charitable deduction rule. Beginning in 2026, you can now directly deduct charitable contributions without itemizing. The amount is $1,000 ($2,000 for a married filing joint tax return). Consider a Donor Advised Fund (DAF). This idea is to be used in conjunction with tips 2 and 3. With this idea, you create a Donor Advise Fund. You then donate appreciated assets (stocks) into the fund (tip 2). You donate enough in one year to exceed the standard deduction for that year (tip 3). You then donate your funds out of the DAF over the years. While the money is no longer yours, you still control what qualified charities receive the money. Note: You cannot use a DAF to qualify for the new, non-itemized charitable giving rule outlined in tip 4.  With each of these ideas, it's essential to follow the rules when donating. If not, your good intentions may not be deemed a qualified donation for tax purposes. Ask for help if you'd like to review your situation.

Graduate students planning to borrow federal student loans should be aware of important changes that took effect on July 1. A last minute court ruling also changed who qualifies for higher borrowing limits, creating uncertainty for some degree programs. For years, many graduate students relied on Graduate PLUS Loans to help cover the full cost of attendance. Under the new rules, those loans are no longer available for new borrowers. Instead, most graduate students will use Direct Unsubsidized Loans, which have annual and lifetime borrowing limits. For most graduate degree programs, federal borrowing is now limited to $20,500 per year, with a lifetime cap of $100,000. Students enrolled in qualifying professional degree programs can borrow up to $50,000 per year, with a lifetime limit of $200,000. Just before the new limits went into effect, a federal judge temporarily blocked the U.S. Department of Education's narrow definition of what qualifies as a professional degree. As a result, students enrolled in several programs, including nursing, psychology, and divinity, remain eligible for the higher borrowing limits while the case moves through the courts. Theology programs, however, fall under the lower borrowing limits based on the current guidance. Because this ruling is temporary, eligibility could change again depending on the outcome of the legal challenge. For students beginning graduate school, these changes may affect how they pay for their education. Those whose programs qualify for the higher borrowing limits may have additional access to federal funding. Others may need to explore scholarships, assistantships, employer tuition assistance, payment plans, or private student loans to help bridge the gap between federal loan limits and the total cost of attendance. If you are planning to start graduate school or are considering returning for an advanced degree, now is a good time to review your financial aid package carefully. Contact your school's financial aid office to confirm how these changes apply to your specific program and discuss your options before borrowing.  As federal student loan policies continue to evolve, staying informed can help you make better financial decisions and avoid unexpected funding challenges.

One of the more surprising financial stories making headlines this week comes from Jeff Bezos. The billionaire entrepreneur is arguing that the bottom half of American earners should pay zero federal income tax. At first glance, that may sound like an idea you would expect from a politician rather than one of the world's wealthiest business leaders. But Bezos says many working Americans are struggling with housing costs, groceries, and everyday expenses, and believes eliminating their federal income tax burden would give them a better chance to get ahead. The idea is simple. Instead of lowering taxes for lower income workers, he wants to eliminate federal income taxes altogether for roughly the bottom 50 percent of earners. According to tax data cited in recent reports, that group currently contributes only a small percentage of total federal income tax revenue. For the average person, the immediate question is obvious: How much money are we talking about? The answer depends on income, family size, deductions, and credits. Many lower income households already owe little or no federal income tax because of existing deductions and tax credits. Because of that, analysts say the biggest benefits would likely go to middle income households rather than the very lowest earners. A similar proposal currently being discussed in Congress would eliminate federal income taxes for many individuals earning less than $46,000 and married couples earning less than $92,000, while also reducing taxes for many middle income families. Of course, the challenge is paying for it. Reducing or eliminating taxes means the federal government would collect less revenue. Some lawmakers have suggested offsetting the cost by increasing taxes on households earning more than $1 million per year. Others argue the focus should be on reducing government spending instead. What makes this story important is not whether the proposal ultimately becomes law. The chances of any major tax overhaul making it through Congress remain uncertain. The bigger story is that conversations about who pays taxes, how much they pay, and whether the tax system should be reshaped are becoming more common across the political spectrum. For many Americans, especially those feeling squeezed by higher living costs, the idea of keeping more of each paycheck is easy to understand.  Whether that happens through tax cuts, spending reforms, or some combination of both will likely remain part of the national debate for years to come.